White Paper--The One-China Principle and the Taiwan Issue
The Taiwan Affairs Office and
The Information Office of the State Council
21 February 2000
Foreword
On October 1, 1949, the
Chinese people won a great victory in the new democratic revolution and founded the
People's Republic of China (PRC). The Kuomintang (KMT) ruling clique retreated from the
mainland to entrench in China's Taiwan Province in confrontation with the Central
Government with the support of foreign forces. This is the origin of the Taiwan issue.
Settlement of the Taiwan issue and realization of the complete reunification of China
embody the fundamental interests of the Chinese nation. The Chinese government has worked
persistently toward this goal in the past 50 years. From 1979, the Chinese government has
striven for the peaceful reunification of China in the form of "one country, two
systems" with the greatest sincerity and the utmost effort. Economic and cultural
exchanges and people-to-people contacts between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits have
made rapid progress since the end of 1987. Unfortunately, from the 1990s, Lee Teng-hui,
the leader of the Taiwan authorities, has progressively betrayed the One-China Principle,
striving to promote a separatist policy with "two Chinas" at the core,
going so far as to openly describe the cross-Straits relations as "state to
state relations, or at least special state to state relations."This action has
seriously damaged the basis for peaceful reunification of the two sides, harmed the
fundamental interests of the entire Chinese nation including the Taiwan compatriots, and
jeopardized peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region. The Chinese government
has consistently adhered to the One-China Principle and resolutely opposed any
attempt to separate Taiwan from China. The struggle between the Chinese government
and the separatist forces headed by Lee Teng-hui finds its concentrated
expression in the question of whether to persevere in the One-China Principle or to create
"two Chinas" or "One-China, one Taiwan."
In August 1993, we issued a white
paper entitled "The Taiwan Question and Reunification of China," which
systematically expounds the fact concerning Taiwan as an inalienable part of China, the
origin of the Taiwan issue and the Chinese government's basic principles and related
policies regarding resolution of the Taiwan question. We deem it necessary here to further
explain to the international community the Chinese government's position and policy on the
One-China Principle.
I. The Basis for One China, de
Facto and de Jure
The One-China Principle has
been evolved in the course of the Chinese people's just struggle to safeguard China's
sovereignty and territorial integrity, and its basis, both de facto and de jure, is
unshakable.
Taiwan is an inalienable part
of China. All the facts and laws about Taiwan prove that Taiwan is an inalienable part of
Chinese territory. In April 1895, through a war of aggression against China, Japan forced
the Qing government to sign the unequal Treaty of Shimonoseki, and forcibly occupied
Taiwan. In July 1937, Japan launched an all-out war of aggression against China. In
December 1941, the Chinese government issued the Proclamation of China's Declaration of
War Against Japan, announcing to the world that all treaties, agreements and contracts
concerning Sino-Japanese relations, including the Treaty of Shimonoseki, had been
abrogated, and that China would recover Taiwan. In December 1943, the Cairo Declaration
was issued by the Chinese, U.S. and British governments, stipulating that Japan
should return to China all the territories it had stolen from the Chinese, including
Northeast China, Taiwan and the Penghu Archipelago. The Potsdam Proclamation signed by
China, the United States and Britain in 1945 (later adhered to by the Soviet Union)
stipulated that "The terms of the Cairo Declaration shall be carried out." In
August of that year, Japan declared surrender and promised in its instrument of surrender
that it would faithfully fulfill the obligations laid down in the Potsdam
Proclamation. On October 25, 1945, the Chinese government recovered Taiwan and the Penghu
Archipelago, resuming the exercise of sovereignty over Taiwan.
On October 1, 1949, the
Central People's Government of the PRC was proclaimed, replacing the government of the
Republic of China to become the only legal government of the whole of China and its sole
legal representative in the international arena, thereby bringing the historical status of
the Republic of China to an end. This is a replacement of the old regime by a new one in a
situation where the main bodies of the same international laws have not changed and
China's sovereignty and inherent territory have not changed therefrom, and so the
government of the PRC naturally should fully enjoy and exercise China's sovereignty,
including its sovereignty over Taiwan.
Since the KMT ruling clique
retreated to Taiwan, although its regime has continued to use the designations
"Republic of China" and "government of the Republic of China," it has
long since completely forfeited its right to exercise state sovereignty on behalf of China
and, in reality, has always remained only a local authority in Chinese territory.
The formulation of the
One-China Principle and its basic meaning. On the day of its founding, the Central
People's Government of the PRC declared to governments of all countries in the world,
"This government is the sole legitimate government representing the entire people of
the People's Republic of China. It is ready to establish diplomatic relations with all
foreign governments that are willing to abide by the principles of equality, mutual
benefit and mutual respect for each other's territorial integrity and sovereignty."
Shortly afterwards, the Central People's Government telegraphed the United Nations,
announcing that the KMT authorities had "lost all basis, both de jure and de facto,
to represent the Chinese people," and therefore had no right to represent China at
all. One principle governing New China's establishment of diplomatic relations with a
foreign country is that it recognizes the government of the PRC as the sole legitimate
government representing the whole of China, severs or refrains from establishing
diplomatic relations with the Taiwan authorities.
These propositions of the
Chinese government met with obstruction by the U.S. government. On January 5, 1950, the
U.S. President Truman issued a statement, saying that the U.S. and other Allied countries
recognized China's exercise of sovereignty over Taiwan Island in the four years since
1945. However, after the start of the Korean War in June 1950, to isolate and contain
China the U.S. government not only sent troops to occupy Taiwan, but it also dished out
such fallacies as "the status of Taiwan has yet to be determined" and later,
step by step, lobbied for "dual recognition" among the international community
in order to create "two Chinas." Naturally, the Chinese government resolutely
opposed this, insisting that there is only one China in the world, Taiwan is a part of
China and the government of the PRC is the sole legal government representing the whole of
China. China has evolved the One-China Principle precisely in the course of the endeavor
to develop normal diplomatic relations with other countries and the struggle to safeguard
state sovereignty and territorial integrity. The above propositions constitute the basic
meaning of the One-China Principle, the crucial point being to safeguard China's
sovereignty and territorial integrity.
During the 30 or 40 years
after 1949, although the Taiwan authorities did not recognize the legitimate status of the
government of the PRC as the representative of the whole of China, they did insist that
Taiwan is a part of China and that there is only one China, and opposed "two
Chinas" and "Taiwan independence. " This shows that for a long time there
has been a common understanding among the Chinese on both sides of the Taiwan
Straits on the fundamental question that there is only one China and Taiwan is a
part of Chinese territory. As far back as October 1958, when the People's Liberation
Army (PLA) was engaged in the battle to bombard Jinmen, Chairman Mao Zedong declared to
the Taiwan authorities, "There is only one China, not two, in the world. You agree
with us on this point, as indicated in your leaders' proclamations." In January 1979,
the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPC) issued a Message to Taiwan
Compatriots, pointing out that "the Taiwan authorities have always stood firm on the
one China position and opposed the independence of Taiwan. This is our common stand
and our basis for cooperation."
The Chinese government's
solemn and reasonable stand for the One-China Principle has gained the understanding and
support of more and more countries and international organizations, and the One-China
Principle has been gradually accepted by the international community at large. In October
1971, the United Nations General Assembly adopted at its 26th session Resolution 2758,
which expelled the representatives of the Taiwan authorities and restored the seat and all
the lawful rights of the government of the PRC in the United Nations. In September 1972,
China and Japan signed a Joint Statement, announcing establishment of diplomatic
relations between the two countries, and that Japan recognizes the government of the PRC
as the only legitimate government of China, fully understands and respects the
Chinese government's position that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of
the PRC, and promises to adhere to the position as prescribed in Article 8 of the Potsdam
Proclamation. In December 1978, China and the U.S. issued the Joint Communique on the
establishment of diplomatic relations, in which the U.S. "recognizes the government
of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal government of China" and
"acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is a part
of China. " Up to now, 161 countries have established diplomatic relations with the
PRC; they all acknowledge the One-China Principle and promise to handle their relations
with Taiwan within the one-China framework.
II. The One-China
Principle--the Basis and Prerequisite for Achieving Peaceful Reunification
The One-China Principle is the
foundation stone for the Chinese government's policy on Taiwan. On Comrade Deng Xiaoping's
initiative, the Chinese government has, since 1979, adopted the policy of peaceful
reunification and gradually evolved the scientific concept of "one country, two
systems." On this basis, China established the basic principle of
"peaceful reunification, and one country, two systems." The key points of this
basic principle and the relevant policies are: China will do its best to achieve peaceful
reunification, but will not commit itself to ruling out the use of force; will actively
promote people-to-people contacts and economic and cultural exchanges between the two
sides of the Taiwan Straits, and start direct trade, postal, air and shipping
services as soon as possible; achieve reunification through peaceful negotiations and, on
the premise of the One-China Principle, any matter can be negotiated. After reunification,
the policy of "one country, two systems" will be practiced, with the main body
of China (Chinese mainland) continuing with its socialist system, and Taiwan
maintaining its capitalist system for a long period of time to come. After reunification,
Taiwan will enjoy a high degree of autonomy, and the Central Government will not send
troops or administrative personnel to be stationed in Taiwan. Resolution of the
Taiwan issue is an internal affair of China, which should be achieved by the Chinese
themselves, and there is no call for aid by foreign forces. The aforementioned principles
and policies embody the basic stand and spirit of adhering to the One-China
Principle, and fully respect Taiwan compatriots' wish to govern and administer Taiwan by
themselves. On January 30, 1995, President Jiang Zemin put forward eight propositions on
the development of relations between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits and the promotion
of peaceful reunification of China, explicitly pointing out: "Adhering to the
One-China Principle is the basis and prerequisite for peaceful reunification. "
Only by adhering to the
One-China Principle can peaceful reunification be achieved. The Taiwan issue is one left
over by the Chinese civil war. As yet, the state of hostility between the two sides of the
Straits has not formally ended. To safeguard China's sovereignty and territorial integrity
and realize the reunification of the two sides of the Straits, the Chinese government has
the right to resort to any necessary means. Peaceful means would be favorable to the
common development of the societies on both sides of the Straits, and to the harmony
and unity of the compatriots across the Straits. Peaceful means is therefore the
best means. The Chinese government's declaration in 1979 on implementing the principle of
peaceful reunification was based on the premise that the Taiwan authorities at that time
upheld the principle that there is only one China in the world and Taiwan is a part of
China. Meanwhile, the Chinese government took into account the fact that the U.S.
government, which for many years had supported the Taiwan authorities, had accepted that
there is only one China in the world, Taiwan is a part of China and the government of the
PRC is the only legitimate government of China, and saw this acknowledgment as being
beneficial to the peaceful resolution of the Taiwan issue. While carrying out the policy
of peaceful reunification, the Chinese government always makes it clear that the means
used to solve the Taiwan issue is a matter of China's internal affairs, and China is under
no obligation to commit itself to rule out the use of force. This is by no means directed
against Taiwan compatriots, but against the scheme to create an "independent
Taiwan" and against the foreign forces interfering in the reunification of China, and
is intended as a necessary safeguard for the striving for peaceful reunification. Resort
to force would only be the last choice made under compelling circumstances.
As for Taiwan, upholding the
principle of one China indicates that it acknowledges that China's sovereignty and
territory are inalienable. In this way, both sides of the Taiwan Straits will have a
common basis and premise and may find ways to solve their political differences and
realize peaceful reunification through consultation on an equal footing. If Taiwan denies
the One-China Principle and tries to separate Taiwan from the territory of China, the
premise and basis for peaceful reunification will cease to exist. As for the
United States, if it promises to follow a one-China policy, it should earnestly implement
the three communiques between the Chinese and U.S. governments and fulfill the series of
promises it has made. It should maintain only cultural, commercial and other
non-governmental relations with Taiwan; oppose "Taiwan independence," "two
Chinas" or "one China, one Taiwan" and not to stand in the way of the
reunification of China. Acting otherwise will destroy the external conditions necessary
for the Chinese government to strive for peaceful reunification.
As for countries in the
Asia-Pacific region and other regions in the world, the situation across the Taiwan
Straits has always been closely linked with the stability of the Asia-Pacific region.
Adherence to the policy of one China by countries concerned will be beneficial to peace
and stability in the Asia-Pacific region and favorable for China to develop friendly
relations with other countries, and therefore conforms to the interests of the
Asia-Pacific region and other countries in the world.
The Chinese government is
actively and sincerely striving for peaceful reunification. To achieve peaceful
reunification, the Chinese government has appealed time and again for cross-Straits
negotiations on the basis of equality and the One-China Principle. Taking Taiwan's
political reality into full account and out of consideration for the Taiwan
authorities' request for the negotiations to be held on an equal footing, we have put
forward one proposal after another, such as that the negotiations should be held between
the Communist Party of China (CPC) and the Chinese KMT on a reciprocal basis and that the
talks between the two parties may include representatives from all parties and mass
organizations of Taiwan, and we have never spoken of negotiations between the
"central and local authorities." The Chinese government has also proposed that
dialogues may start first, including political dialogues, which may gradually move on to
procedural consultations for political talks to solve the name, the topics for
discussion and the forms of official talks before political talks are held. Political
talks may be carried out step by step. First, negotiations should be held and an agreement
reached on an official end to the state of hostility between the two sides under the
principle of one China so as to jointly safeguard China's sovereignty and territorial
integrity and work out plans for the development of the future cross-Straits
relations. In January 1998, to seek and expand the political basis for relations between
the two sides, the Chinese government explicitly proposed to the Taiwan side that before
the realization of reunification and in handling affairs concerning inter-Straits
relations, especially during the talks between the two sides, the One-China Principle
should be upheld, namely that there is only one China in the world, Taiwan is a part of
China and China's sovereignty and territorial integrity is not to be separated. The
Chinese government hopes that on the basis of the One-China Principle, the two sides will
hold consultations on an equal footing and discuss national reunification together.
To strive for peaceful
reunification, the Chinese government has adopted a series of positive policies and
measures to promote the comprehensive development of cross-Straits relations. From the end
of 1987, when the state of isolation between the two sides was terminated, to the end of
1999, the number of Taiwan compatriots coming to the mainland of China for visiting their
relatives, sightseeing or exchanges reached 16 million by turnstile count. The total
indirect trade volume between the two sides of the Straits has exceeded US$ 160 billion;
the agreed capital to be invested by Taiwan business people in the mainland has exceeded
US$ 44 billion, of which US$ 24 billion has been actually used. Great progress has been
made in the exchange of mail and telecommunications across the Straits; and some progress
has been made in the exchange of air and shipping services too. The NPC and its Standing
Committee, the State Council, and local governments have worked out a sequence of laws and
regulations to safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Taiwan compatriots.
To properly solve the concrete issues arising from the people-to-people contacts
between the two sides through consultations, in November 1992 the mainland's Association
for Relations Across the Taiwan Straits and Taiwan's Straits Exchange Foundation
reached the common understanding during talks on routine affairs that each of the
two organizations should express verbally that "both sides of the Taiwan Straits
adhere to the One-China Principle." On this basis, the leaders of these two
organizations successfully held the "Wang Daohan-Koo Chen-fu talks" and signed
several agreements on protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the
compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Straits in April 1993. In October 1998, the
leaders of the two organizations met in Shanghai, starting political dialogue across the
Straits. The talks between the two organizations were carried out on an equal footing.
Practice has proved that on the basis of the One-China Principle, it is entirely possible
to find a proper way for holding talks, based on equality, between the two sides. Since
Hong Kong and Macao's return to China, people-to-people contacts and exchanges between
Hong Kong and Taiwan and between Macao and Taiwan have continued and developed on the
basis of the One-China Principle.
III. The Chinese
Government--Staunch Champion for the One-China Principle
Separatist forces in Taiwan
are bent on violating the One-China Principle. In 1988, after Lee Teng-hui became the
leader of the Taiwan authorities, he publicly stated time and again that the basic policy
of the Taiwan authorities was that "there is only one China, not two," and
"we have always maintained that China should be reunited, and we adhere to the
principle of 'one China.'” However, since the early 1990s, Lee Teng-hui has
gradually deviated from the One-China Principle, trumpeting "two governments,"
"two reciprocal political entities," "Taiwan is already a state with
independent sovereignty," and "At the present stage the Republic of China is on
Taiwan and the People's Republic of China is on the mainland." Moreover, he went back
on his words, saying that "I have never said that there is only one China." In
addition, he has connived at and provided support for the separatists who advocate
"Taiwan independence" and their activities, thus helping the rapid development
of the "Taiwan independence" forces and the spread of the "Taiwan
independence" ideology. Under the direction of Lee Teng-hui, the Taiwan authorities
have adopted a series of measures toward actual separation. In matters of Taiwan's form of
government, the Taiwan authorities are seeking to transform Taiwan into an
"independent political entity" through a "constitutional reform," so
as to suit the needs of creating "two Chinas." In foreign relations, the
Taiwan authorities have spared no effort to carry out the activities for "expanding
the international space of survival," with the aim of creating "two
Chinas." Since 1993, for seven years running, the Taiwan authorities have maneuvered
for participation in the United Nations. In military affairs, the Taiwan authorities have
bought large quantities of advanced weapons from foreign countries and sought to join the
Theater Missile Defense system (TMD), in an attempt to establish a military alliance of a
disguised form with the United States and Japan.
In ideology and culture, the
Taiwan authorities have endeavored to obliterate the Chinese awareness of Taiwan
compatriots, especially young people, and their identification with the motherland, in
order to create misunderstanding of the motherland among Taiwan compatriots and estrange
them from her, thus cutting off the ideological and cultural ties between the compatriots
on both sides of the Taiwan Straits. Since 1999, Lee Teng-hui has stepped up his
separatist activities. In May, he published the book The Road to Democracy, which
advocates the division of China into seven regions, each enjoying "full
autonomy." On July 9, he went so far as to publicly distort the cross-Straits
relations as "state to state relations, or at least special state to state
relations," in an attempt to fundamentally change the status of Taiwan as a part
of China, sabotage the relations between both sides of the Taiwan Straits,
especially the basis for cross-Straits political dialogues and negotiations, and wreck the
foundation for peaceful reunification. Lee Teng-hui has become the general representative
of Taiwan's separatist forces, a saboteur of the stability of the Taiwan Straits, a
stumbling-block preventing the development of relations between China and the United
States, and a troublemaker for the peace and stability of the Asia-Pacific region.
The Chinese government firmly
defends the One-China Principle. The Chinese government and people have always maintained
sharp vigilance and fought resolutely against the secessionist activities of the Taiwan
separatists, represented by Lee Teng-hui.
After Lee Teng-hui's
"private" visit to the United States in June 1995, the Chinese government has
waged a resolute struggle against separation and against "Taiwan independence,"
and made strong protests and representations to the U.S. government for openly
allowing Lee Teng-hui to visit the U.S., violating its promises made in the three
Sino-U.S. joint communiques, and seriously prejudicing China's sovereignty. This struggle
has shown the Chinese government and people's firm resolve and ability to safeguard state
sovereignty and territorial integrity, and exerted an important and far-reaching
influence. Compatriots in Taiwan have further realized the serious harm "Taiwan
independence" can cause. Lee Teng-hui has received a heavy blow for his separatist
activities in the international community, so that some of the "Taiwan
independence" protagonists have had to abandon certain extremist propositions aimed
at division. The international community has further realized the necessity of upholding
the one-China policy. The U.S. government has explicitly undertaken not to support
"Taiwan independence," not to support "two Chinas" or "one China,
one Taiwan," and not to support Taiwan joining any international organization whose
membership is restricted to sovereign states.
The Chinese government and
people have fought more unremittingly after Lee Teng-hui cooked up his "two
states" theory. The relevant department of the Chinese government has clearly stated
that the attempt of the Taiwan separatists to implement the "two states" theory
in "legal" form was an even more serious and dangerous step toward division and
a grave provocation against peaceful reunification. Were the attempt to succeed, it would
be impossible for China to achieve peaceful reunification. The struggle against this
attempt has grown in momentum with Chinese both at home and abroad condemning the
"two states" theory with one voice. Most countries in the world have reaffirmed
their position of upholding the One-China Policy. The U.S. government has also reasserted
its adherence to the One-China Policy and its commitment to the "Three
Non-supports" for Taiwan. Finally, the Taiwan authorities have been compelled to
announce that they will not amend their "constitution" and "laws"
according to the "two states" theory.
Nevertheless, separatists in
Taiwan are still attempting to detach Taiwan "de jure" from China in the name of
the "Republic of China" by various forms, including "formulating a new
constitution," "amending the constitution," and "explaining the
constitution" or through "legislation." Special vigilance should be
maintained to the fact that the Taiwan separatists are continually scheming to disrupt the
Sino-U.S. relations and provoke conflicts and confrontation between the two nations to
achieve their aim of dividing China.
Facts prove that a serious
crisis still exists in the situation of the Taiwan Straits. To safeguard the interests of
the entire Chinese people including compatriots in Taiwan and maintain the peace and
development of the Asia-Pacific region, the Chinese government remains firm in adhering to
"peaceful reunification" and "one country, two systems"; upholding the
eight propositions put forward by President Jiang Zemin for the development of
cross-Straits relations and the acceleration of the peaceful reunification of China; and
doing its utmost to achieve the objective of peaceful reunification. However, if a grave
turn of events occurs leading to the separation of Taiwan from China in any name, or if
Taiwan is invaded and occupied by foreign countries, or if the Taiwan authorities refuse,
sine die, the peaceful settlement of cross-Straits reunification through negotiations,
then the Chinese government will only be forced to adopt all drastic measures possible,
including the use of force, to safeguard China's sovereignty and territorial integrity and
fulfill the great cause of reunification. The Chinese government and people absolutely
have the determination and ability to safeguard China's sovereignty and territorial
integrity, and will never tolerate, condone or remain indifferent to the realization of
any scheme to divide China. Any such scheme is doomed to failure.
IV. Several Questions Involving
the One-China Principle in the Cross-Straits Relations
Chinese territory and
sovereignty has not been split, and the two sides of the Straits are not two states. The
Taiwan authorities support their position on "two Chinas," including
the "two states" theory proposed by Lee Teng-hui, with the following arguments:
Since 1949, the territories on
either side of the Straits have been divided and governed separately, with neither side
having jurisdiction over the other; the government of the PRC has never ruled Taiwan;
and since 1991 Taiwan has witnessed a form of government that has nothing to do with
that of the Chinese mainland. These arguments are absolutely untenable, and can never
lead to the conclusion that Taiwan may declare itself a state under the name of
the "Republic of China," or that the two sides of the Straits have been
divided into two states. Firstly, state sovereignty is inseparable. The territory is the
space in which a state exercises its sovereignty. In the territory of a country there
can only be a central government exercising sovereignty on behalf of the state. As
we have already said, Taiwan is an inalienable part of Chinese territory and, after
replacing the government of the Republic of China in 1949, the government of the PRC
has become the sole legal government of China, enjoying and exercising sovereignty over
the whole of China, including Taiwan.
Although the two sides of the
Straits remain to be reunified, the long-term existence of this abnormal situation has not
imbued Taiwan with a status and rights in international law, nor can it change the legal
status of Taiwan as a part of China. The problem now is that the separatists in Taiwan and
some foreign anti-China forces seek to change this state of affairs, and it is this that
the Chinese government and people are firmly against.
We firmly oppose changing
Taiwan's status as a part of China by referendum. The Taiwan separatists' attempt to
change Taiwan's status as a part of China by referendum on the pretext that "
sovereignty belongs to the people" is futile. Firstly, under both domestic and
international laws Taiwan's legal status as a part of Chinese territory is unequivocal,
and there can be no premise for using referendum to decide any matter of
self-determination. Secondly, the phrase "sovereignty belongs to the people"
refers to all the people of state, and not certain people or the people of a
certain area. The sovereignty over Taiwan belongs to all the Chinese people including
Taiwan compatriots, and not to some of the people in Taiwan. Thirdly, at no time in
history has Taiwan been a state in its own right, and since 1945 Taiwan has not been a
foreign colony, nor has it been under foreign occupation. The issue of national
self-determination, therefore, does not exist. In short, from the time that China
recovered Taiwan in 1945, there has been no question at all of changing Taiwan's status as
a part of China by holding a referendum. The only future for Taiwan is reunification
with the China mainland, and certainly not separation. Any attempt to separate Taiwan from
China through so-called referendum would only lead the Taiwan people to disaster.
The "two German states
formula" cannot be applied to the settlement of the Taiwan issue. Some people in
Taiwan have suggested that cross-Straits relations should be dealt with according to the
"two German states formula," since Germany was divided into two states after the
Second World War, and was later reunified. This proposal shows a misunderstanding of
history and reality. The division of Germany after the war and the temporary division
between the two sides of the Straits are questions of a different nature, the difference
lying mainly in three aspects. The first is the reasons for, and the nature of, the
division. After its defeat in the Second World War in 1945, Germany was divided into zones
occupied separately by the four victorious nations of the United States, Britain, France
and the Soviet Union according to a declaration on the defeat of Germany and the
assumption of supreme authority and the subsequent Potsdam Agreement. The reunification of
Germany became a focus of the confrontation in Europe between the United States and the
Soviet Union during the cold war. The Federal Republic of Germany and the German
Democratic Republic were established in the zones occupied by the U.S., Britain and
France, and that occupied by the Soviet Union. Thus Germany was divided into two
states. Obviously, the German question arose entirely from external factors, while the
Taiwan issue, left over by China's civil war, is a matter of China 's internal affairs.
The second aspect is the difference in status between the two under international law.
Germany was divided according to a series of international treaties during and after the
Second World War, while the Taiwan question involves provisions of the Cairo Declaration,
the Potsdam Proclamation and other international treaties, stating that Japan must return
Taiwan, which it had stolen from China, to the Chinese. The third is the difference
between the two in their actual conditions of existence.
Against the backdrop of the
confrontation between the U.S. and the Soviet Union, the two German states had foreign
troops stationing in their territories and so were compelled to recognize each other and
co-exist in the international community. The Chinese government has always persisted in
the principle of one China. Before Lee Teng-hui assumed power, and during his early days
in office, the Taiwan authorities recognized only one China and opposed "two
Chinas," and the One-China Principle has also been widely accepted by the
international community. For these reasons, the Taiwan issue and the German issue cannot
be placed in the same category, nor can the "two German states formula" be
copied to settle the Taiwan question. Any question can be discussed under the
One-China Principle. The Chinese government advocates that the final purpose of
cross-Straits negotiations is to achieve peaceful reunification; and that to achieve this
purpose, talks should be held based on the principle of one China. However, the proposals
for " Taiwan independence," "two Chinas" and "two states,"
aiming for separation instead of reunification, violate the One-China Principle, and are
naturally unacceptable to the Chinese government. Provided that it is within the framework
of one China, any question can be discussed, including the various issues that are of
concern to the Taiwan side. The Chinese government believes that Taiwan's international
space for economic, cultural and social activities compatible with its status, the
political status of the Taiwan authorities and other questions can be finally
settled in the process of peaceful reunification through political negotiations within
this framework.
The so-called controversy
about democracy and system is an excuse for obstructing the reunification of China. In
recent years the Taiwan authorities have repeatedly declared that " democratization
on the China mainland is the key to the reunification of China" and that "the
real essence of the cross-Straits issue is a contest between systems." This is an
excuse for postponing and resisting reunification, as well as a scheme to deceive
compatriots in Taiwan and world opinion. The CPC and the Chinese government have
consistently striven to achieve socialist democracy. To achieve peaceful reunification in
the form of "one country, two systems," and to allow the two different social
systems on both sides of the Straits to coexist without imposing them on one or the
other--this is best able to embody the wishes of compatriots on both sides of the Straits
and is itself democratic. The different social systems across the Straits, therefore,
should not constitute any barrier to peaceful reunification. Moreover, the Chinese
government acknowledges the differences between Taiwan on the one hand and Hong Kong and
Macao on the other and, after peaceful reunification, is prepared to apply a looser form
of the "one country, two systems" policy in Taiwan than in Hong Kong and Macao.
It is totally unreasonable and undemocratic for the Taiwan authorities to seek to obstruct
reunification on the pretext of the "controversy about democracy and system" and
to force the more than 1.2 billion people living on the Chinese mainland to practice the
political and economic systems in Taiwan. The demand for democracy should not be used as a
reason for refusing reunification. The essence of the difference between the two sides of
the Straits on this question lies by no means in the controversy over whether to practice
democracy or in the controversy over what system to practice, but rather a controversy
over the choice between reunification and separation.
V. Several Questions Involving
Adherence to the One-China Principle in the International Community
The Chinese government has
expressed its appreciation to the international community for widely pursuing a one-China
policy. In August 1993, we published the white paper The Taiwan Question and Reunification
of China. In Chapter V of this document, "Several Questions Involving Taiwan in
International Relations," we explained our position and policy on a number of issues,
including relations between Taiwan and countries maintaining diplomatic ties with China,
relations between international organizations and Taiwan, aviation services between Taiwan
and countries having diplomatic relations with China, and arms sales to Taiwan by
countries having diplomatic relations with China. Here, we would like to reaffirm our
related position and policy.
Taiwan is ineligible for
membership of the United Nations and other international organizations whose membership is
confined to sovereign states. The United Nations is an inter-governmental international
organization composed of sovereign states. After the restoration of the lawful rights of
the PRC in the United Nations, the issue of China's representation in the UNO was resolved
once and for all and Taiwan's re-entry became totally out of the question. The Taiwan
authorities have asserted that Resolution 2758 of the UN resolved only "the problem
of China's representation," but not "the problem of Taiwan's
representation," and demanded participation in the UN. We will never permit such a
separatist act of creating "two Chinas' or "one China, one Taiwan."
All members of the UN should
adhere to the purpose and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and related UN
resolutions, abide by norms governing international relations, including mutual respect
for sovereignty and territorial integrity and non-interference in each other's internal
affairs, and never, in any form, support Taiwan's joining the UN or other international
organizations whose membership is confined to sovereign states.
On the basis of the principle
of one China, the Chinese government has made arrangements for Taiwan's participation in
some inter-governmental international organizations which accept region membership in an
agreeable and acceptable way according to the nature, regulations and actual conditions of
these international organizations. As a region of China, Taiwan has participated in the
Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) respectively
in the names of "Taipei, China" and "Chinese Taipei." In
September 1992, the chairman of the council of the predecessor of the World Trade
Organization (WTO), the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), stated that Taiwan
may participate in this organization as "a separate Taiwan-Penghu-Jinmen-Mazu tariff
zone" (abbreviated as Chinese Taipei) after the PRC's entry to GATT. The WTO should
persist in the principle defined in the aforesaid statement when examining the acceptance
of Taiwan's entry to the organization. This is only an ad hoc arrangement and cannot
constitute a model applicable to other inter-governmental international organizations or
international gatherings.
No country maintaining
diplomatic relations with China should provide arms to Taiwan or enter into military
alliance of any form with Taiwan. All countries maintaining diplomatic relations with
China should abide by the principles of mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial
integrity and non-interference in each other's internal affairs, and refrain from
providing arms to Taiwan or helping Taiwan produce arms in any form or under any pretext.
The Taiwan question is the
most crucial and most sensitive issue in the relations between China and the U.S.
The three Sino-U.S. joint communiques are the basis for the healthy and stable development
of relations between the two countries. For over twenty years, the U.S. has promised to
adhere to a One-China Policy, which has brought to itself benefits such as the
establishment of diplomatic relations with China, the development of Sino-U.S. relations
and the relative stability of the Taiwan situation. Regrettably, the U.S. has repeatedly
contravened its solemn undertakings to China made in the August 17 Communique and
continued its sale of advanced arms and military equipment to Taiwan. Recently, some
people in the U.S. Congress have cooked up the so-called Taiwan Security Enhancement Act
and are attempting to include Taiwan in the TMD. This is gross interference in China 's
internal affairs and a grave threat to China's security, obstructing the peaceful
reunification of China and jeopardizing the peace and stability of the Asia-Pacific region
and the world at large. The Chinese government is firmly against such actions.
The Chinese government adheres
to the One-China Principle in dealing with Taiwan's contacts with the outside world. The
Taiwan authorities have spared no effort to promote "pragmatic diplomacy" in the
international arena and enlarge their "international space of survival," the
essence of these being to create "two Chinas" or "one China, one
Taiwan." It is only natural that the Chinese government should firmly oppose these.
Meanwhile, considering the needs of Taiwan's socio-economic development and the actual
benefits of compatriots in Taiwan, the Chinese government has no objection to Taiwan's
non-governmental economic and cultural contacts with foreign countries; in fact, on the
premise of one China, it has adopted many flexible measures to make Taiwan's economic,
trade and cultural contacts with foreign countries more convenient. For example, Taiwan
may stay on the International Olympic Committee in the name of "Chinese Taipei."
As a matter of fact, Taiwan has maintained extensive economic, trade and cultural
relations with many countries and regions in the world. Every year, a million Taiwan
compatriots go abroad for travel, business or study, as well as for academic, cultural or
sports exchanges, and Taiwan's annual import and export trade volume has exceeded the
US$200-billion mark. This has demonstrated that adhering to the One-China Principle has
not prevented Taiwan compatriots from engaging in non-governmental international exchanges
or affected the needs of Taiwan's normal economic, trade and cultural activities.
Conclusion
China has a long history of
5,000 years. The Chinese people have lived and multiplied on this land where all ethnic
groups have mixed together, in the course of which they have evolved powerful
cohesiveness, and the values of cherishing and safeguarding unity. Over the long course of
history, the Chinese nation has witnessed changes of dynasties, transfers of governments,
local separatist regimes, and foreign invasions, especially the untold invasions and
dismemberment by foreign powers in modern history. However, unity has always been the main
trend in the development of Chinese history. After every separation, the country was
invariably reunified, only to be followed in its wake by rapid political, economic,
cultural, scientific and technological development. Our compatriots in Taiwan have a
glorious tradition of patriotism, and have performed brilliant exploits in the struggles
against foreign invasions of Taiwan. Since the founding of the PRC, the Chinese people
have particularly valued their hard-earned national independence, firmly upheld state
sovereignty and territorial integrity and struggled unswervingly for reunification of the
motherland. The 5,000-year history and culture have been implanted deeply in the minds of
the Chinese people, sprouting the strong national consciousness of the need for national
unification.
The Chinese government hopes
that the international community will follow the principle of one China now and always and
that the U.S. government will earnestly fulfil all the principles concerning the Taiwan
issue in the three Sino-U.S. joint communiques, and its solemn promise to uphold the
One-China Principle.
As the Chinese government has
successively resumed the exercise of sovereignty over Hong Kong and Macao, the people of
the whole of China are eager to resolve the Taiwan issue as early as possible and realize
the total reunification of the country. They cannot allow the resolution of the Taiwan
issue to be postponed indefinitely. We firmly believe that the total reunification of
China will be achieved through the joint efforts of the entire Chinese people including
compatriots on both sides of the Taiwan Straits and those living overseas.
-End-
|
