head3a.jpg (10843 bytes)
home.jpg (1120 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
summary.jpg (1793 bytes)

documents.jpg (1356 bytes) alldocs.jpg (1458 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
treaties.jpg (1218 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
japan.jpg (1799 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
conference.jpg (1719 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
communique.jpg (1621 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
uslaw.jpg (1640 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
congress.jpg (1876 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
un.jpg (1841 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
law.jpg (1460 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
other.jpg (1531 bytes)

related.jpg (1674 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
map.jpg (1141 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
glossaries.jpg (1371 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
bibliography.jpg (1625 bytes)
spacer.jpg (782 bytes)
links.jpg (1178 bytes)


Agreed Minutes between Japanese and Chinese Plenipotentiaries

Taipei, 28 April 1952

green_line.gif (209 bytes)

 

Agreed Minutes between the Japanese and Chinese Plenipotentiaries

 

I 

Chinese Delegate:

    It is my understanding that the expression "or which may hereafter be" in the Notes No. 1 exchanged today can be taken to mean "and which may hereafter be." Is it so?

Japanese Delegate:

    Yes, it is so. I assure you that the Treaty is applicable to all the territories under the control of the Government of the Republic of China.

 

II

Chinese Delegate:

    It is my understanding that the property rights or interests in Japan of the collaborationist regimes created in China, as a result of the so-called "Mukden Incident" of 18 September 1931, such as "Manchukuo" and the "Wang Ching-wei regime," shall be transferable to the Republic of China upon agreement between the two Parties in accordance with the relevant provisions of the present Treaty and of the San Francisco Treaty. Is it so?

Japanese Delegate:

    It is so.

 

III

Chinese Delegate:

I understand that nothing in the provisions under Article 14 (a) 2 (II) (ii) of the San Francisco Treaty shall be construed to extend any exceptions to the real property, furniture, and fixtures used by such set-ups as were established since 18 September 1931, without the concurrence of the Republic of China and were once claimed to be diplomatic of consular set-ups of the Japanese Government in China and the personal furniture and furnishings and other private property used by the personnel of such set-ups. Is it so?

Japanese Delegate:

It is so.

 

IV

Japanese Delegate:

    It is my understanding that since the Republic of China has voluntarily waived the service compensation as stated in paragraph 1(b) of the Protocol of the present Treaty, the only benefit that remains to be extended to her under Article 14 (a) of the San Francisco Treaty is Japan's external assets as stipulated in Article 14 (a) 2 of the same Treaty. Is it so?

Chinese Delegate:

Yes, it is so.

(Signed)Yeh Kung-chao
(Signed) Isao Kawada

 

green_line.gif (209 bytes)
Source: United Nations Treaty Series 1952 (reg. no. 1858), pp. 52-54.